PSYCHOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY VIEWED FROM ANOTHER FLANK

Main Article Content

Lali Surmanidze

Abstract

Jerome Bruner believed that the gap between psychology and anthropology was the biggest mistake of the science studying the human being. Despite fragmentary attempts, real cooperation between psychologists and anthropologists has not been yet established in the field of psychological anthropology. Considering this field a subdiscipline still prevents psychologists and anthropologists from intense cooperation to create a joint, synthetic intellectual product. The solution of conceptual and epistemological  dilemmas  and overcoming the dichotomic understanding of antithesis along with the clear orientation of empirical  and research practice on a mutually supplementary, hybrid use of methods, places modern psychological  anthropology among the disciplines which aim to pursue a fundamental goal: to integrate controversial  realities into a whole, while recognizing their complex interaction and coexistence. It is quite clear that the above cannot be an aspiration of any subdiscipline. Today, psychological anthropology is facing a number of issues related to self-reflection and conceptual and methodological rethinking, the tasks requiring synthetic solution. Psychological anthropology is the space where the most complex dilemmas, with a powerful cognizing potential equally important for psychology and anthropology, intersect. It is a meeting space for versatile methodological resources. By its nature, psychological anthropology is an interdisciplinary space where different sciences (humanities, natural, social, behavioral) intersect and which is able to create a fertile ground for the development of a transdisciplinary theory of human being. 

Keywords:
psychological anthropology, cultural psychology, conceptual and epistemological dilemmas, methodology, interdisciplinary
Published: Jul 19, 2022

Article Details

How to Cite
Surmanidze , L. . (2022). PSYCHOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY VIEWED FROM ANOTHER FLANK . Georgian Psychological Journal, 3. https://doi.org/10.52340/gpj.2022.07.07
Section
Articles

References

Adamopoulos John and Lonner Walter J. (2001). Culture and Psychology at a Crossroad: Historical

Perspective and Theoretical Analysis. In: The Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Ed.by

David Matsumoto. Oxford University Press p.p. 11-35.

Basia. D. Ellis and Henderikus J. Stam. (2015). Crisis? What crisis? Cross-cultural psychology’s

appropriation of cultural psychology. In: Culture & Psychology, Vol. 21 (3) 293–317.

Beatty, Andrew (2019). Psychological Anthropology. https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/

document/obo-9780199766567/obo-9780199766567-0124.xml#obo-9780199766567-0124-

bibItem-0007.

Beatty, Andrew. (2017). Psychological anthropology: An awkward hybrid? In The Routledge

companion to contemporary anthropology. Edited by Simon Coleman, Susan B. Hyatt, and Ann

Kingsolver, 382–399. London: Routledge.

Bennardo, Giovanni & Munck, Victor C. D. (2014). Cultural models: Genesis, methods, and

experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Berry John W., Poortinga Ype H., Segall Marshall H., Dasen Pierre R. (2002). Cross-Cultural

Psychology. Research and Applications. SECOND EDITION, Cambridge University Press.

Bock, Philip K. (1999). Rethinking psychological anthropology: Continuity and change in the study

of human action. Waveland Press.

Bock, Philip K. Stephen C. Leavitt. (2019). Rethinking Psychological Anthropology: A Critical

History 3rd Edition, Kindle Edition https://www.amazon.com/Rethinking-Psychological-

Anthropology-Critical-History-ebook/dp/B07JNSN3M5

Bourguignon Erika, Hartranft, Linda (1987). Anthropology and psychology: THE VICISSITUDES

OF A LONG-TERM RELATIONSHIP--THEODORE SCHWARTZ. Discussion.

Bruner Jerome. (2008). Culture and mind: Their fruitful incommensurability. Ethos, 36, 29–45.

Cahan Emily D. and White Sheldon H. (1992). Proposals for a Second Psychology. American

Psychologist Vol. 47. No. 2, 224-235 Inc. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.47.2.224

Chkhaidze, T., Chubinidze, D., & Gegenava, E. (2019). Fatalism – Georgian Cultural Model. Prizren

Social Science Journal, 3(3), 41-52.

Chkhaidze, Tamar & Surmanidze, Lali. Culture and Individual Action: Rebuilding the Broken

Dialog Between Anthropology and Psychology. Human Arenas-An Interdisciplinary Journal of

Psychology, Culture, and Meaning. First Online: 28 December 2019. ISSN: 2522-5790 (Print)

-5804 (Online) https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42087-019-00091-9

Cole, Michael (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Belknap Press

of Harvard University Press.

D’Andrade, Roy G. (1995). The Development of Cognitive Anthropology. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Dressler, William W. (2020). Cultural consensus and cultural consonance: Advancing a cognitive

theory of culture. Field Methods, 32(4), 383-398.

Eller, Jack David. (2019). Psychological Anthropology for the 21st Century. Routledge Tayler and

Francis group. Chapter 1, 7-29.

Fish, Jefferson M (2000), “What Anthropology can do for Psychology: Facing Physics Envy,

Ethnocentrism, and a Belief in ‘Race’,” American Anthropologist 102(3): 552-563. Available

online, UCSD only.

Gamsakhurdia, VL. (2020). Systematic Semiotic Organisation and Anthropologisation of the Science

of Soul–Towards Cultural Psychology. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science 54,

-638.

Greenfield, Patricia (2000). “What Psychology can do for Anthropology, or Why Anthropology took

Postmodernism on the Chin,” American Anthropologist 102(3): 564-576. Available online,

UCSD only.

Hickman, Jacob R. (2010). Psychology and Anthropology. In, 21st Century Anthropology: A Reference

Handbook. H. James Birx, Ed. Pp. 950-959. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (link to academia.edu)

Hollan, Douglas. (2012). On the Varieties and Particularities of Cultural Experience. ETHOS, Vol.

, Issue 1, pp. 37–53, American Anthropological Association ISSN 0091-2131 online ISSN

-1352.

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328191320_Georgian_Proverbs_and_Cultural_Models_

of_Adaptive_Behavior.

Ingham, J.M. (2001). “Psychological anthropology,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social &

Behavioral Sciences, pp. 12349-12355.

Jahoda, Gustav. (2002). Reflections of a “Pre-Nominal” Cross-Cultural Psychologist. Online Readings

in Psychology and Culture, 2(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1008

Jewitt, C., & Leder Mackley, K. (2019). Methodological dialogues across multimodality and sensory

ethnography: digital touch communication. Qualitative Research, 19(1), 90–110. https://doi.

org/10.1177/1468794118796992

Jewitt, C., Chubinidze, D., Price, S., Yiannoutsou, N., & Barker, N. (2021). Making sense of digitally

remediated touch in virtual reality experiences. Discourse, Context & Media, 41. https://doi.

org/10.1016/j.dcm.2021.100483.

Kashima, Y., & Gelfand, M. J. (2012). A history of culture in psychology. in: Handbook of the History

of Social Psychology, First Published 2011 Imprint Psychology Press.

Kashima, Yoshihisa. (2015). Culture and Psychology in the 21st Century: Conceptions of Culture and

Person for Psychology Revisited, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 1–17.

Kim, Uichol. (2001). Culture, Science and Indigenous Psychologies: an Integrated Analysis In D.

Matsumoto (Ed.), The handbook of culture and psychology (p. 11–34). Oxford University Press.

-75.

Kwang-Kuo Hwang; (2006). Constructive Realism and Confucian Relationalism. An Epistemological Strategy for the Development of Indigenous Psychology. In: Indigenous and Cultural Psychology.

Understanding People in Context. Edited by Uichol Kim, Kuo-Shu Yang, and Kwang-Kuo

Hwang. Springer Science+Business Media, pp. 73-107.

LeVine, R. A. (1999). An agenda for psychological anthropology. Ethos, 27(1), 15-24.

Lindholm, Charles. (2007); Culture and Identity. The History, Theory, and Practice of Psychological

Anthropology. First published in the United States of America by McGraw-Hill, pp. 9-12.

Miller Joan G. (1994). Cultural Psychology: Briding Disciplinary Boundaries in Understanding the

Cultural Grounding of Self. In: Handbook of Psychological Anthropology. Philip K. Bock (ed.)

Westport, Connecticut-London; Greenwood Press.

Miller Joan G. (1997). Theoretical issues in cultural psychology. in: Handbook of cross-cultural

psychology Volume 1; Pages 85-128.

Quinn, N. (2011). The History of the Cultural Models School Reconsidered: A Paradigm Shift in

Cognitive Anthropology. In D. B. Kronenfeld, M. Bennardo, V. De Munck, & M. Fischer, A

companion to cognitive anthropology (pp. 30-46). Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

Russell Bernard. H. 1994 Research Methods in Anthropology. Qualitative and Quantitative

Approaches. ALTA MIRA press 1994.

Schensul, Jean J., LeCompte, Margaret D. (2013). Essential ethnographic methods: a mixed methods

approach - 2nd ed.p. cm. - (Ethnographer’s toolkit; Book 3) Copyright © by AltaMira Press,

ISBN 978-0-7591-2204-8 (electronic).

Schwartz Theodore (1992). Anthropology and psychology: an unrequited relationship. in: New

directions in psychological anthropology; eds.: Theodore Schwartz, Geoffrey White; Catherine

Lutz (eds.); Cambridge University Press, p. 324-349.

Shore, Bradd (1996). Culture in mind: Cognition, culture, and the problem of meaning. New York:

Oxford University Press.

Shore, Bradd (2000), “Human diversity and human nature: the life and times of a false dichotomy,” Being

Humans”, N. Roughley, ed. pp. 81-103.

Shweder, R. A. (1991). Thinking through cultures: Expeditions in cultural psychology. Cambridge,

MA: Harvard University Press.

Shweder, Richard (1979-80), “Rethinking culture and personality theory,” Parts 1-3, Ethos 7: 255-

; 7: 279-311; 8: 60-94.

Shweder, Richard A. (1990). Cultural Psychology: What Is It? In: Cultural Psychology: Essays on

Comparative Human Development. James W. Stigler, Richard A. Shweder, and G. Herdt, eds.

Pp. 1-43. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Spindler, George D. (1980). General Introduction In: The Making of Psychological Anthropology.

edited by George D. Spindler, 1980 University of California Press, lid. 7-39.

Spiro, Melford E. (1986). Cultural Relativism and the Future of Anthropology in: Cultural Anthropology •

Volume 1, Issue 3 p. 259-286.

Strauss, Claudia, & Quinn, Naomi. (1997). A Cognitive Theory of Cultural Meaning. Cambridge,

UK: Cambridge University Press.

Theory in Social and Cultural Anthropology: An Encyclopedia (2013). Ed: R. Jon McGee & Richard

L. Warms, Chapter Title: “Psychological Anthropology”, SAGE Publications, Inc 1st edition

გვ.: 658-663.

Toren Christina (2002). Psychological Anthropology. Cultural psychology and social construction

theory. in: Encyclopedia of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Ed. by Alan Barnard Jonathan

Spencer, Routledge 687-689; 690-691.

Toren Christina. (2012) Anthropology and Psychology in: The Sage Handbook of Social Anthropology.

Ed. Richard Fardon, Olivia Harris, Trevor H.J. Marchand, Mark Nuttall, Chris Shore, Veronica

Strang, Richard A. Wilson, Volume 1, 27-41 Los Angeles, London, Sage.

Valsiner, Jaan (2000). Culture and human development. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. Valsiner, Jaan (2012). Culture in Psychology: A Renewed Encounter of Inquisitive Minds / The

Oxford Handbook of Culture and Psychology. Edited by Jaan Valsiner. Print Publication Date:

May; DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396430.013.0001

Valsiner, Jaan (2014). An invitation to cultural psychology. London: Sage Publications Ltd.

Valsiner, Jaan (2016). The Nomothetic Function of the Idiographic Approach: Looking from Inside

Out. Journal of Person [1] Oriented Research, 2(1–2), 5–15. DOI: 10.17505/jpor.2016.02

Valsiner, Jaan (2019b). Culture & psychology: 25 constructive years. In: Culture & Psychology,

(4), 429–469. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067x19872358

Valsiner, Jaan and Rosa, Alberto. Editors’ Introduction (2007). in: Contemporary Socio-Cultural

Research. Uniting Culture, Society, and Psychology. The Cambridge Handbook of Sociocultural

Psychology. Ed. By Jaan Valsiner and Alberto Rosa. Cambridge University Press გვ. 1-22.

Wagoner, Brady and Bresco de Luna, Ignacio. (2018). Culture, history, and psychology: Some

historical reflections and research directions. In: Culture & Psychology, Vol. 24(3) 294–309.

Wagoner, Brady. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In: Dynamic

process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 99-121). Springer, New

York, NY.

White, Geoffrey M. & Lutz, Catherine A. (1992). Intriduction. In: New direction in Psychological

Anthropology. Theodor Schwartz, Geoffry M. White, Katherine A. Lutz (eds.). Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

Yeganeh, H., Su, Z., & Chrysostome, E. V. M. (2004). A Critical Review of Epistemological and

Methodological Issues in Cross-Cultural Research. Journal of Comparative International

Management, 8 (1).

Hansen, Klaus P. (2000). Kultur und Wissenschaft. A. Francke Verlag Tubingen und Basel.

Брунер Д.С. (2001). Торжество разнообразия: Пиаже и Выготский. Вопросы психологии. 4.

Стр. 3-13.

Лотман, Ю. (2000). Культура и взрыв. В книге: Лотман Ю. М. Семиосфера. – С.-Петербург:

«Искусство–СПБ».

Терборн Г. (1999). Принадлежность к культуре, местоположение в структуре и человеческое

действие: объяснение в социологии и социальной науке /Теория общества-фундаменталь-

ные проблемы М. «Канон-Пресс-Ц Кучково поле» გვ. 73-100.

ბერკი პიტერ. (2002). ისტორია და სოციალური თეორია. პროგრ. ლოგოსი და გამომც. „ლოგოს პრესი“ თბილისი.

ერიქსენი თომას ჰილანდ (2018). მცირე ადგილები, ვრცელი საკითხები. შესავალი სოციალურ და კულტურულ ანთროპოლოგიაში, მეოთხე გამოცემა, გამომც. „საქართველოს მაცნე“.

სურმანიძე ლალი. (2010). კულტურა მეთოდოლოგიურ პერსპექტივაში. გამომც. „უნივერსალი“, თბილისი.

ჩუბინიძე, დიმიტრი (2018). ქართული ანდაზები და ადაპტაციური ქცევის კულტურული მოდელები [Georgian proverbs and cultural models of adaptive behavior]. დისერტაცია დოქტორის აკადემიური ხარისხის მოსაპოვებლად. ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი. თბილისი.

ჩხაიძე თამარ (2021). ფატალიზმი – ქართული კულტურული მოდელი. (Fatalism – Georgian Cultural Model.). (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). დისერტაცია დოქტორის აკადემიური ხარისხის მოსაპოვებლად. ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნივერსიტეტი. თბილისი.

წულაძე ლია. (2019). სოციოლოგიური კვლევის თვისებრივი მეთოდები. თბილისი, თსუ გამომცემლობა. თავი 5, გვ. 150-193.