THE PSYCHOLOGICAL NATURE AND FACTORS OF BULLYING

Main Article Content

Nata Asatiani
Mzia Tsereteli

Abstract

Bullying is a growing problem all over the world. It is encountered everywhere and for this very reason it has become a major challenge of the 21 century to study the psychological nature of bullying and analyze the factors responsible for bullying among the adolescent population. The purpose of the given desk research is to study the psychological mechanism of bullying and identify the factors preventing bullying behavior. The corresponding sources made it possible to view bullying as an integrated system and study its underlying psychological mechanism: the components of the system, the key factors of bullying and their interaction. The research showed significant relationship between the following three factors: personal aggression, the existence of an object of aggression and environmental possibilities. Due to this the psychological phenomenon of bullying is viewed in the context of Anthropic Theory of Set. According to this theory, aggression, the object of aggression (victim) and the environ- ment allowing the person to manifest aggression are the necessary preconditions of bullying. The given work attempts to construct a model of bullying based on the Theory of Set, a model that  represents a single system comprising various factors. The article also makes suggestions regarding the further research into the operation of the system in question. 

Keywords:
bullying, bully, object of aggression – object of need satisfaction, need, set, instrumental possibilities
Published: Jul 19, 2022

Article Details

How to Cite
Asatiani , N. ., & Tsereteli , M. . (2022). THE PSYCHOLOGICAL NATURE AND FACTORS OF BULLYING . Georgian Psychological Journal, 2. https://doi.org/10.52340/gpj.2022.07.11
Section
Articles

References

Bauman, S. (2011). Cyberbullying: What Counselors need to Know. American Counseling Association.

Brighton, H., & Sayeed, L. (1990). The pervasiveness of Senior Management’s View of the Cultural

Gaps Within a Division. Groups and Organization Studies, 266-278.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS.

Campbell, M. B. (2018). Reducing Cuberbullying at schools.

Chang, F. C. (2013). Relationships among Cyberbullying, School Bullying, and Mental Health in

Taiwanese Adolescents. Journal of School Health.

Craig, G. J. (2001). Human Development. Upper Saddle River, N.J. : Prentice Hall,.

dictionary.apa.org. (n.d.). dictionary.apa.org. Retrieved from https://dictionary.apa.org/aggression

DuFour, R. P. (1990). Clear Vision for Successful Leadership. National Association of Secondary

School Principals Bulletin.

Duke, D. (1990). Setting Goals for Professional Development. Education Leadership, 71-75.

Ferguson, C. J. (2012). Paradigm Change in Aggression Research: The time has come to retire the

general aggression model. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 220–228.

Gendron B, W. K. (2011). An Analysis of Bullying among Students within Schools. Journal of School Violance, 150-164.

Gorton, R., & Alston, J. (2011). School Leadership & Administration. New York: MC Graw Hill.

Guerra, K. R. (2007). Prevalence and Predictors of Internet Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, S14-S21.

Hickman, C. R., & Silva, M. A. (1985). Creating Excellence. Penguin Books.

Huang, F. &. (2015). The Impact of Definition and Question Order on the Prevalence of Bullying

Victimization Using Student Self-reports. Psychological Assessment. Imedi TV. (2017). imedinews.ge. Retrieved from https://imedinews.ge/ge/saqartvelo/31851/kvleva-skolebshi-dzaladobis-da-chagvris-4-431-shemtkhveva-dapiqsirda

Josefowitz, N. (1980). Path to a Power: A Woman’s Guide from First Job to Top Executive.

Juvenon J., &. G. (2008). Extending the School grounds? Bullying Experiences in Cyberspace. Jour-

nal of School Health, 496-505.

Kaukiainen, C. S. (1996). Bullying as a Group Process: Participant roles and their relations to social

status within the group. Retrieved from Wiley Online Library.

Kim YS, L. B. (2006). School Bullying and Youth Violance. Arc Gen Psychiatry.

Kim, J. S. (2016). A Distinct for of Deviance or a Variation of Bullying? Examining the developmen-

tal pathways and motives of cyberbullying compared with traditional bullying in South Korea. Crime & Delinquency, 1-26.

Kowalski, R. &. (2013). Psychologica, Physical, and Academic Correlates of Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health.

Kubiszewski, V. F. (2015). Does Cyberbullying Overlap with School Bullying when Taking Modality of Involvement into Account? Computers in Human Behaviour, 49-57.

Lee, C. (2004). Preventing Bullying in Schools / A guide for teachers and other professionals. Lon-

don: Paul Chapman Publishing.

li, Q. (2010). Cyberbullying in High Schools: A study of student’s behaviors and beliefs about this

new phenomenon. Journal of Agression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 372-391.

Marcus, R. F. (2007). Aggression and Violence in Adolescence. Cambridge University Press.

Morley, P. S.-Z. (1989). Adhering to Organizational Culture: What Does it Mean? Why Does it Mat-

ter? Group and Organization Studies, 483-500.

Oakes, J., & Lipton, M. (1990). Making the Pest of Schools: A Handbook for Parents, Teachers, and

Policymakers. New Haven: Yale University Press.

O’Connell, P. P. (1999). Peer Involvement in Bullying: Insignts and Challenges fot Interention. Jour-

nal of Adolescence, 437-452.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at School: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell.

Peskin MF, T. S. (2007). Bullying and Victimization and Internalizing Symptoms among Low-income Black and Hispanic Students. Adolesc Health.

Peterson, K. D., & Deal, T. E. (1998). How Leaders Influence the Culture of Schools. Educational

Leadership, 28-30.

Salmivalli, C. (2001). Group View on Victimization: Empirical findings and their implications. New York: Guilford Press.

Sansone, R. A. (2008). Bully Victims: Psychological and Somatic Aftermaths. Psychiatry MMC, 1-5. Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An Overview of the Schwartz Theory of Basic Values. Retrieved from Online

Reading in Psychology and Culture: https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/orpc/vol2/iss1/11/

Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of Culture and Organizational Analysis. Administrative Science Quar-

terly, 64-69.

Smith, P. a. (1982). Too Soon to Cheer? Synthesis of Research of Effective Schools. Educational

Leadership.

Sourander A, J. P. (2007). What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in

childhood? The Finnish “From a Boy to a Man” study. Pediatrics, 97-404.

Staude-Muller. F., H. B. (2013). How Stressful in Online Victimization? Effects of victim’s person-

ality and properties of the incident. . European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 260-274.

Sticca, F. &. (2013). Is cuberbullying worse than traditional bullying? Examining the differential roles of medium, publicity and anonymity for the perceived severity of bullying. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 7390750.

Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. Cyberpsychology & Behaviour.

Suler, J. (2004). The Online Disinhibition Effect. Mary Ann Liebert.

Swearer, S. H. (2015). Understanding the Psychology of Bullying. American PSychologist, 344-250. Swearer, S. M. (2015). Understanding the Psychology of Bullying . American Psychologist, 344-350. Tsereteli, M., & Martskvishvili, K. (2010). Predicting Student’s Self-Competence Using School Culture Factors. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, Vol. 21, 163-169.

Unnever, J. D. (2004). Middle School Victims of Bullying: Who reports being bullied? Aggressive

Behavior, 373-388.

Vélez-Agosto, N. M. (2011). Bronfenbrenner’s Bioecological Theory. Association of Psuchological

Science.

Waasdorp, T. &. (2015). The Overlap between Cyberbullying and Traditional Bullying. Journal of

Adolescent Health, 483-488.

Козлов, Н. (n.d.). Encyclopedia of Practical Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.psychologos.

ru/articles/view/teoriya-ekologicheskih-sistem-uri-bronfenbrennera

Роберт Бэрон, Д. Р. (2000). Агрессия [Aggression]. Питер.

ალანია, მ. (2017). ძალადობის და მიჯაჭვულობის ურთიერთმიმართება ბავშვებსა

და მოზარდებში, ივანე ჯავახიშვილის სახელობის თბილისის სახელმწიფო უნი-

ვერსიტეტი ფსიქოლოგიის და განათლების მეცნიერებათა ფაკულტეტი.

ნადირაშვილი, შ. (2001). განწყობის ანტროპული თეორია. [The Anthropic Theory of Set].

თბილისი: უზნაძის სახელობის ფსიქოლოგიის ინსიტიტუტი.

საქართველოს სახალხო დამცველი [Public Defender of Georgia]. (2017). ombudsman.ge. http://

ombudsman.ge/res/docs/2019041112215840195.pdf.

ქურხული, ლ. (2006). აგრესია ბავშვებში [Aggression in Children]. თბილისი: საარი.

წერეთელი, მ. (2015). ქართველ, სომეხ და აზერბაიჯანელ სტუდენტთა ინტერკულტუ-

რული სენსიტიურობა საქართველოში [Intercultural Sensistivity of Georgian, Armenian

and Azeri Students in eorgia].ttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/334000443_kartvel_

somekh_da_azerbaijanel_studentta_interkulturuli_sensitiuroba_sakartveloshi