PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE GEORGIAN VERSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE QUESTIONNAIRES

Main Article Content

Khatuna Martskvishvili
Natia Sordia
Aljoscha Neubauer

Abstract

The goal of the study is to examine the psychometric properties of the Georgian versions of the Big  Five Inventory (BFI; John & Strivastava, 1999) and the Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling,  Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003), the two instruments measuring the Big Five model. 866 individuals partic- ipated in the study examining the Georgian version of BFI and 377 individuals in the development of  the Georgian version of TIPI. According to the results, the factor structure of both instruments replicates  the five-factor model observed in other cultures. The reliability coefficients correspond to the minimum  levels recommended for personality questionnaires/inventories. However, these levels turned out to be  lower for TIPI. The instrument validity is proved by their logical correlations with the theoretically  relevant constructs, namely with the Six-Factor model, aversive personality traits, and emotional intelli- gence. We can conclude that due to the factor structure, expected relationships with other constructs and  statistical significance, the Georgian versions of both instruments measuring the Big Five can be used  for future research. 

Keywords:
Big Five model of personality, BFI, TIPI, Psychometrics
Published: Jul 19, 2022

Article Details

How to Cite
Martskvishvili , K. ., Sordia , N. ., & Neubauer , A. . (2022). PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES OF THE GEORGIAN VERSIONS OF THE BIG FIVE QUESTIONNAIRES . Georgian Psychological Journal, 2. https://doi.org/10.52340/gpj.2022.07.08
Section
Articles

References

Andrei, F., Siegling, A. B., Aloe, A. M., Baldaro, B., & Petrides, K. V. (2015). The Incremental Va-

lidity of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire (TEIQue): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 261–276. doi:10.1080/00223891.2015.1084630

Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO-60: A Short Measure of the Major Dimensions of Per-

sonality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4),340–345. doi:10.1080/00223890902935878

Bartlett, M.S. (1954) A Note on the Multiplying Factors for Various Chi Square Approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16, 296-298.

Baudry, A.S., Grynberg, D., Dassonneville, C., Lelorain, S., & Christophe, V. (2018). Sub-dimensions

of Trait Emotional Intelligence and Health: A Critical and Systematic Review of the Literature. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 59(2), 206–222. doi:10.1111/sjop.12424

Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1990). Comparing Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: A

Study on the 5-factor Model of Personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(90)90065-Y

Cattell, R. B. (1966). The Scree Test for the Number of Factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research,

(2), 245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10

Chapman B. P., Duberstein P. R., Sorensen S., Lyness J. M., (2007). Gender Differences in Five Factor Model Personality Traits in an Elderly Cohort. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(6) 1594-1603.

Christie, R., & Geis. F. L. (1970). Studies in Machiavellianism. New York: Academic Press

Costa, P. T., Terracciano, A., & McCrae, R. R. (2001). Gender Differences in Personality Traits across

Cultures: Robust and Surprising Findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81,

–331.

Costa, P.T. Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual. Psychological Assessment Resources.

DeYoung, C. G., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2002). Higher-order Factors of the Big Five Pre-

dict Conformity: Are there neuroses of health? Personality and Individual Differences, 33(4),

-552. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869(01)00171-4

Eysenck, H. J. (1998). Intelligence: A New Look. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative “Description of Personality”: The Big-Five Factor Structure.

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-

6.1216

Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The Development of Markers for the Big-Five Factor Structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26–42. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26

Gosling, S. D., Rentfrow, P. J., & Swann, W. B. (2003). A Very Brief Measure of the Big-Five Per-

sonality Domains. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(6), 504–528. doi:10.1016/s0092-

(03)00046-1 Greven, C., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., Arteche, A., & Furnham, A. (2008). A Hierarchical Integration of Dispositional Determinants of General Health in Students: The Big Five, Trait Emotional Intelligence and Humour Styles. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1562–1573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.01.012

John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big-Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford Press.

Kaiser, H. (1970). A Second Generation Little Jiffy. Psychometrika, 35, 401–15.

Kaiser, H. (1974). An Index of Factorial Simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–6.

Kessler, S. R., Bandelli, A. C., Spector, P. E., Borman, W. C., Nelson, C. E., & Penney, L. M. (2010).

Re-examining Machiavelli: A Three-dimensional Model of Machiavellianism in the Workplace.

Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 1868–1896.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five-factor Model and the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582.

Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO Personality Factors in the Indigenous Personality Lexicons of English and 11 Other Languages. Journal of Personality, 76(5), 1001–1054.doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00512.x

Leung, D. Y. P., Wong, E. M. L., Chan, S. S. C. & Lam, T. H. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the

Big Five Inventory in a Chinese Sample of Smokers Receiving Cessation Treatment: A Valida-

tion Study. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 3(6), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep. v3n6p1

Maccoby E. E., & Jacklin C. N. (1975). The Psychology of Sex Differences. Stanford: Stanford Uni-

versity Press.

Martskvishvili, K., Arutinov, L., & Mestvirishvili, M. (2013). A Psychometric Investigation of the

Georgian Version of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29(2), 84–88. doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000135.

McCrae, R. R., & Terracciano, A. (2005). Universal Features of Personality Traits from the Observ-

er’s Perspective: Data From 50 Cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(3),

–561. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.547

McCrae, R. R., Zonderman, A. B., Costa, P. T., Jr., Bond, M. H., & Paunonen, S. (1996). Evaluating

the Replicability of Factors in the Revised NEO Personality Inventory: Confirmatory Factor Analysis versus Procrustes Rotation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 552–566.

Mikolajczak, M., Luminet, O., Leroy, C., & Roy, E. (2007). Psychometric Properties of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire: Factor Structure, Reliability, Construct, and Incremental Validity in a French-Speaking Population. Journal of Personality Assessment, 88, 338–353.

DOI: 10.1080/00223890701333431

Nunnally, J.O. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill

Neumann, C. S., Hare, R. D., & Pardini, D. A. (2014). Antisociality and the Construct of Psychopathy:

Data from Across the Globe. Journal of Personality, 83(6), 678–692. doi:10.1111/jopy.12127

Norman, W. T. (1963). Toward an Adequate Taxonomy of Personality Attributes: Replicated Factor Structure in Peer Nomination Personality Ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574‒583.

O’Boyle, E. H., Forsyth, D., Banks, G. C., Story, P. A., & White, C. D. (2014). A Meta-analytic Test

of Redundancy and Relative Importance of the Dark Triad and Five-Factor Model of Personality.

Journal of Personality, 83, 644–664. doi:10.1111/jopy.12126. Paulhus, D. L. (2013). Dark Triad of Personality (D3-Short). Measurement Instrument Database for the Social Science. Retrieved June 22, 209 from www.midss.ie. last access on 15.10.2019

Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The Dark Triad of Personality: Narcissism, Machiavel-

lianism, and Psychopathy. Journal of Research in Personality, 36(6), 556–563. doi:10.1016/

s0092-6566(02)00505-6

Petrides, K. V., & Furnham, A. (2003). Trait Emotional Intelligence: Behavioural Validation in Two Studies of Emotion Recognition and Reactivity to Mood Induction. European Journal of Personality, 17, 39–57. doi: 10.1002/per.466

Petrides, K. V., Pita, R., & Kokkinaki, F. (2007) The Location of Trait Emotional Intelligence in Person- ality Factor Space. British Journal of Psychology, 98, 273-289. doi:10.1348/000712606X120618

Petrides, K. V., Vernon, P. A., Schermer, J. A., Ligthart, L., Boomsma, D. I., & Veselka, L. (2010). Relationships between Trait Emotional Intelligence and the Big Five in the Netherlands. Person-

ality and Individual Differences, 48(8), 906–910. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.02.019

Petrides, K.V. (2009). Technical Manual for the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaires

(TEIQue). London: London Psychometric Laboratory.

Schmitt D. P., Realo A., Voracek M., & Allik J. (2008) Why Can’t a Man Be More Like a Woman?

Sex Differences in Big Five Personality Traits Across 55 Cultures. Journal of Personality and

Social Psychology, 94, No.1, 168-182

Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017). Short and Extra-short Forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI- 2-S and BFI-2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality, 68, 69–81. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2017.02.004

Ubbiali, A., Chiorri, C., Hampton, P. & Donati, D. (2013). Psychometric Properties of the Italian Adaptation of the Big Five Inventory (BFI). Bollettino di Psicologia Applicata, 266, 37-46.

Vassend, O., & Skrondal, A. (1997). Validation of the NEO Personality Inventory and the Five-factor

Model: Can findings from exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis be reconciled? uropean

Journal of Personality, 11, 147–166.